<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>StevoFC.com &#187; MP3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.stevofc.com/tag/mp3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.stevofc.com</link>
	<description>The official blog of StevoFC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 14:07:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Sansa: The MP3 Player That Could</title>
		<link>http://blog.stevofc.com/2010/08/18/sansa-the-mp3-player-that-could/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.stevofc.com/2010/08/18/sansa-the-mp3-player-that-could/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 12:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Electronics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MP3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandisk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sansa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.stevofc.com/?p=843</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back in January of 2009 we got a new telephone system installed at work. The included &#8220;tones&#8221; in the system while people were waiting on hold, or even for a call to connect were bad, really bad. We contacted the company who installed the system knowing that we could set up a device for hold [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.stevofc.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/sansa1.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-844 alignright" title="sansa1" src="http://blog.stevofc.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/sansa1.png" alt="" width="175" height="271" /></a>Back in January of 2009 we got a new telephone system installed at work. The included &#8220;tones&#8221; in the system while people were waiting on hold, or even for a call to connect were bad, really bad. We contacted the company who installed the system knowing that we could set up a device for hold music.</p>
<p>They had various &#8220;hold music devices&#8221; that were fairly expensive. If I remember correctly, the cheapest one they sold was over $250. I thought about it for a few minutes and said, &#8220;can&#8217;t we just use an MP3 player?&#8221;</p>
<p><span id="more-843"></span> Obviously the man on the phone didn&#8217;t care for my idea very much because they didn&#8217;t sell MP3 players for this function. But surprisingly he said he didn&#8217;t see it being a problem. We all questioned the reliability of a relatively inexpensive MP3 playing device, but now I can say that reliability has not been an issue at all.</p>
<p>I went to Best Buy in February of 2009 and saw a Sandisk Sansa Clip on sale for $34. I figured even if it only lasted a few months we would get our money&#8217;s worth. We purchased legal MP3 files to serve the function of hold music, which also includes overlays of words such as &#8220;please stay on the line, your call is important to us&#8221; that fades in over the music on occasion.</p>
<p>It is now August 18, 2010 and the MP3 player has never stopped playing. <strong>It has been running continuously for nearly 600 days straight</strong>. Just in case something happens to the device, we have 3 extra ones purchased during a special on Woot.com for $20 a piece.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.stevofc.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/sansa.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-845  alignright" style="margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 5px;" title="sansa" src="http://blog.stevofc.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/sansa.jpg" alt="" width="250" height="250" /></a>Here is a photo taken today of the MP3 player in action. The battery inside even acts as a backup if we have power issues. Which reminds me to point out that the battery still keeps a charge.</p>
<p>Needless to say, flash storage based MP3 players can apparently last a very long time. I would not hesitate to purchase a Sandisk MP3 player if my need for one ever arises.  They are built great and can&#8217;t be beat for the price.</p>
<p>For those interested, here is a link to the updated <a href="https://www.amazon.com/dp/B002MAPS6W?tag=stevofccom-20&amp;camp=213381&amp;creative=390973&amp;linkCode=as4&amp;creativeASIN=B002MAPS6W&amp;adid=06S9SQVYGBZK6QH3R0M1&amp;" target="_blank">Sansa Clip+</a>. It is less than $50 for 8gb of storage and is expandable with a microSD slot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.stevofc.com/2010/08/18/sansa-the-mp3-player-that-could/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CD Ripping:  AAC over MP3</title>
		<link>http://blog.stevofc.com/2010/02/02/cd-ripping-aac-over-mp3/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.stevofc.com/2010/02/02/cd-ripping-aac-over-mp3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 23:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MP3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.stevofc.com/?p=602</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently I upgraded to iTunes 9, and I began to notice many of my tags within my MP3 files had been removed.  I am not sure if this was due to iTunes, or the original encoding of the MP3s which I had performed using an older version of iTunes.  I had made the decision to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="size-full wp-image-614 alignright" style="margin: 1px 4px;" title="mp3FileIcon128" src="http://blog.stevofc.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/mp3FileIcon128.png" alt="" width="128" height="128" />Recently I upgraded to iTunes 9, and I began to notice many of my tags within my MP3 files had been removed.  I am not sure if this was due to iTunes, or the original encoding of the MP3s which I had performed using an older version of iTunes.  I had made the decision to re-rip my CD collection and was torn between AAC and MP3 file formats.</p>
<p>I decided to re-rip all of my CDs and I was weighing out the differences between AAC and MP3.  When you rip songs from a CD in iTunes, you can choose what file format you would like the songs to be saved in, and different file formats do have different strengths and weaknesses.  Generally speaking trading off file size for sound quality.</p>
<p><span id="more-602"></span>The two (2) most common file types in iTunes are MP3 and AAC, although iTunes also offers Apple Lossless Encoding, AIFF, and WAV.  For the sake of this post I will be focusing on AAC and MP3. AAC was created as an improved performance codec over MP3, and the advanced audio coding (AAC) was promoted as successor to MP3.  These encoded files are higher in quality, but the same could also be said of Microsoft’s Windows Media format, and OGG files, but none are supported as well as good old MP3.  AAC is the native file format for iTunes, however one may not want to use due to this format now being as widely supported.  Just about every OS (including favors of Linux) will play an MP3 file out of the box, however playing AAC files generally requires the end user to download a 3rd party piece of software (Apple’s Mac OS X excluded).</p>
<p>AAC&#8217;s file format does have some improvements over MP3, and I have outlined a few of them.</p>
<p>* More frequencies (from 8 to 96 kHz) than MP3 (16 to 48 kHz)<br />
* Up to 48 channels<br />
<em>(MP3 supports up to two channels in MPEG-1 mode and up to 5.1 channels in MPEG-2 mode)</em><br />
* Higher efficiency and simpler filterbank<br />
* Higher coding efficiency for stationary signals<br />
<em>(AAC uses a blocksize of 1024 or 960 samples, allowing more efficient coding than MP3&#8217;s 576 sample blocks)</em><br />
* Higher coding accuracy for transient signals<br />
<em>(AAC uses a blocksize of 128 or 120 samples, allowing more accurate coding than MP3&#8217;s 192 sample blocks)</em></p>
<p>With all of this being said, why do many people still prefer to use MP3 file formats?  I would have to answer that mainly with the how easy it is create and also from the popularity it had gained from peer-2-peer applications.  The first large peer-2-peer application was Napster which came online in 1999 &#8211; 2000.  This gave thousands (if not  millions at the time)  of music fans access to download (illegally) all of their favorite songs and albums from just about every artist.</p>
<p><strong>My Recommendation:</strong></p>
<p>If you have a PC or a Mac, and also have a iPhone or iPod, I would recommend using the AAC file format.  As an end user you can convert the AAC file to a MP3 file if desired, or if you wish to play a particular track on a device that does not support AAC.  In the long run you will be able to store more music, while still obtaining a high quality sound.  Please take a moment to vote on which file type you prefer.</p>
Note: There is a poll embedded within this post, please visit the site to participate in this post's poll.
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.stevofc.com/2010/02/02/cd-ripping-aac-over-mp3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

